(716) 247-5254 admin@wmarnis.com

The System or the Practitioner: What Actually Makes a Martial Art Legendary?

We all hear the hype – these “legendary” systems: Balintawak, Modern Arnis, Pekiti-Tirsia. They’re supposedly the best. But let’s cut through the noise. Are these arts truly legendary – or was it the legends behind them?

Is the art really that good, or was it Bacon, Presas, and Gaje who made it shine?

I’ll tell you straight – I’m not convinced any system is inherently amazing. I’ve got thoughts on that, but that’s for another time. What I know? It’s the person who makes the system, not the other way around.

I’ve been saying this for years: A system is only as good as the people sweating for it.

I’ve seen every system under the sun – karate, taekwondo, jiu-jitsu, kung fu, FMA – and in every one, I’ve seen both top-tier people and bottom-of-the-barrel. It’s not the system – it’s who’s doing the work.

Early on, I’d show up at events, and people would ask: “Tim, are you sure you’re Modern Arnis?” I’d say, “Yeah, why?” They’d say, “Because you’re good.” Why the surprise? Because a lot of folks were just dabbling – cross-training. They weren’t trying to become Filipino martial artists. They were adding FMA bits to something else. You can’t expect the same result.

Even now, I hear, “Tim, you and your people are solid – but how do you explain this other person?” Easy. Sometimes standards were low. Sometimes they got rank based on time served. Or maybe they’re better teachers than fighters. And guess what? That’s fine. There’s room for that too.

Kenpo gets it: The first five degrees are what you take from the art; the next five are what you give back.

Now when I judge someone, I want the whole picture. Are they a technician? A competitor? A teacher? Maybe all of the above. Maybe none. I’ve seen it all.

At countless seminars – FMA and beyond – I get compliments. Not because I’m special, but because I put in the effort. I know I’d excel in any Filipino system because I outwork the hype. It’s obvious when my crew and I show up – we stand out. Even in systems we don’t teach, people pair with us. We’ll figure out the techniques, even if the instructor’s busy.

I’ve been offered rank in other systems because of my work ethic – sometimes outperforming the host. I don’t take inflated ranks, though. But I know I can make any Filipino system work – because I make it work.

So, what makes a martial art legendary? The system? Or the person doing the work?

Don’t assume the name makes it great. Go see for yourself. You might be surprised which “legendary” art is solid – or not.

In the end, I know this: It’s not about the system. It’s about how you apply what you learn.

So what do you think? Let’s hear it.

Respectfully,
Datu Tim Hartman
Modern Arnis Tribal Chief

Learning From a Master Doesn’t Always Make You a Student

Recently, I was listening to an FMA discussion podcast featuring several Modern Arnis practitioners when a comment by Bruce Chu of Florida really made me think.

He said:

“Professor had a lot of followers and participants, but not a lot of students.”

At first, that statement might sound controversial, but the more I thought about it, the more I understood exactly what he meant.

Professor Remy Presas introduced Modern Arnis to thousands of martial artists through seminars, camps, and demonstrations around the world. Those who attended absolutely learned from him, and many even hosted his events. His influence is beyond question.

But it raises an interesting question:

Does learning from a master automatically make you their student?

I don’t believe it does.

A student-teacher relationship is built through consistency, guidance, correction, accountability, and mutual commitment. It is an ongoing relationship, not simply a shared experience.

Here’s one way to look at it.

I’ve spoken with people who say they trained with Professor for ten years. That sounds impressive until you learn they may have only attended one seminar each year. If each seminar lasted five hours, that’s roughly fifty hours of instruction over an entire decade.

Now compare that to your own school.

If someone attended only five hours of class each year for ten years, would you consider them one of your active students? Most instructors probably wouldn’t. We’d likely describe them as someone who participated occasionally.

So why should the definition change simply because the instructor lived in another state or another country?

Distance doesn’t redefine the relationship. It only changes the opportunity for interaction.

My own experience was different.

I began training in Modern Arnis in 1985 and trained with Professor regularly for many years. Between monthly training, seminars, camps, private instruction, and extended weekends together, I estimate I accumulated well over 1,500 hours of direct training with him.

I don’t mention that to elevate my experience. I mention it to illustrate what an ongoing student-teacher relationship can look like. It was built over years of repeated instruction, correction, conversation, and mentorship—not just memorable seminars.

That doesn’t diminish anyone else’s experience.

A single seminar with a master can change the direction of your martial arts journey. You can learn lessons that stay with you for life.

But inspiration and mentorship are not always the same thing.

Learning from a master doesn’t always make you a student.

I’ve always made a distinction in my own school between participants, members, and students. Every person who walks through the door has value, but occasional participation isn’t the same as an ongoing student-teacher relationship.

The same applies to me.

I’ve attended seminars taught by exceptional martial artists throughout my career. I gladly give those instructors credit for what they taught me. But if I trained with someone once—or even several times—I wouldn’t honestly claim to be their student. I was a participant who had the privilege of learning from them.

The same principle applies outside of martial arts. I regularly attend business conferences and seminars where I learn from outstanding presenters. Their knowledge has helped me grow, but attending a presentation doesn’t make them my mentor. Just as in martial arts, a true student-teacher relationship requires an ongoing connection.

None of this diminishes Professor Presas’ legacy.

If anything, it highlights the extraordinary reach of his influence. Thousands learned from him. Thousands were inspired by him. His impact on Filipino Martial Arts is immeasurable.

At the same time, I believe we honor our teachers best by honestly describing the relationships we had with them.

Words matter.

Relationships matter.

Giving proper credit doesn’t diminish anyone’s experience—it puts it into its proper perspective.

So I’ll leave you with this question:

Where did your relationship with Professor fit? Were you a long-term student under his guidance, or were you someone who had the privilege of learning from him through seminars and camps? Both experiences have value—they’re simply different.

The original thought came from Bruce Chu, and I wanted to give him full credit for planting the seed for this discussion.

My goal isn’t to divide anyone or diminish anyone’s journey. It’s simply to encourage thoughtful reflection about what it truly means to be a student.

I’d genuinely like to hear your perspective.

Respectfully,
Datu Tim Hartman
The Tribal Chief