(716) 247-5254 admin@wmarnis.com

Part 2 — Dealing With the Trolls

One of the questions I get asked the most is:

“How do you deal with trolls?”

Simple.

You let them work for you.

Whether people realize it or not, trolls are often your biggest promoters. If nobody’s talking about you — good or bad — then chances are you’re probably not making much noise online.

Now don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying it never gets annoying. Sometimes it absolutely does. But after a while, you start realizing something important:

Social media platforms don’t care whether engagement is positive or negative.

They just care that people are engaging.

Comments, shares, reactions, arguments, debates… all of it feeds the algorithm. The machine doesn’t understand the “quality” of your content. It understands activity. If people are talking about your post, the platform assumes it’s interesting and starts pushing it farther.

That’s why, especially when you’re first starting out, you should engage with people.

Reply to comments.

Thank supporters.

Throw a thumbs up back at somebody.

Even critics can help boost your content if you engage the right way.

Attention is currency online.

And honestly, this isn’t even new. It’s just an updated version of an old media strategy:

“If it bleeds, it leads.”

Now obviously there’s a line. If somebody becomes abusive, threatening, or starts harassing your followers, then block them or report them. I’ve had to do that before too. Some people completely cross the line online because they think anonymity protects them.

And the funny thing is, most of these trolls don’t even use real accounts. You click their page and it’s empty — no posts, no pictures, no life. The account exists solely so they can take shots at people.

Heck, sometimes it might even be people you know personally.

But honestly, most trolls aren’t real threats. They’re just angry people screaming into the void because they want attention too.

Personally, I don’t let it bother me much. I’m Gen X. We grew up busting chops constantly, so most insults online don’t even register anymore.

People body shame me, mock me, challenge me to fights, say ridiculous stuff… and honestly, I usually just laugh.

I’ve had people tell me I look like the love child of John Madden and Guy Fieri. My response? “I’m too old to be their kid.”

At the end of the day, if somebody keeps watching your videos just so they can complain…

they’re still watching.

That’s the part they don’t understand.

Now of course, you’ve also got the “internet warriors” who challenge everybody online. I’ve had people invite me to fly across the country on my own dime just to fight them in somebody’s backyard promotion while everyone else profits off the content.

That’s not a challenge. That’s stupidity.

Meanwhile, I’ve spent decades teaching martial arts around the world. I’ve taught in 28 states and 18 countries, built a platform of over 500,000 followers, and produced multiple videos with millions of views.

And ironically, my biggest viral content usually ISN’T the controversial stuff.

Right now I’ve got a walking cane video approaching 8 million views between Facebook and Instagram alone.

That’s authentic martial arts content connecting with people — not manufactured drama.

Now do I poke the MMA and BJJ crowd sometimes?

Of course I do.

But that’s maybe one or two videos a month. The internet just amplifies controversy louder than everything else.

And for the record, I actually train in Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu and have even helped produce a cage fighting champion in the past. But online narratives are funny. People take one or two controversial clips and suddenly act like that’s your entire identity.

The biggest lesson I can give people is this:

Don’t fake outrage just for clicks.

Don’t become a character you can’t maintain.

Be authentic.

Stand on your opinions.

Have fun with it.

And understand that once your platform starts growing, trolls are simply part of the game.

Next up:
The fallout, pressure, and unexpected consequences that come with visibility online.

Learning From a Master Doesn’t Always Make You a Student

Recently, I was listening to an FMA discussion podcast featuring several Modern Arnis practitioners when a comment by Bruce Chu of Florida really made me think.

He said:

“Professor had a lot of followers and participants, but not a lot of students.”

At first, that statement might sound controversial, but the more I thought about it, the more I understood exactly what he meant.

Professor Remy Presas introduced Modern Arnis to thousands of martial artists through seminars, camps, and demonstrations around the world. Those who attended absolutely learned from him, and many even hosted his events. His influence is beyond question.

But it raises an interesting question:

Does learning from a master automatically make you their student?

I don’t believe it does.

A student-teacher relationship is built through consistency, guidance, correction, accountability, and mutual commitment. It is an ongoing relationship, not simply a shared experience.

Here’s one way to look at it.

I’ve spoken with people who say they trained with Professor for ten years. That sounds impressive until you learn they may have only attended one seminar each year. If each seminar lasted five hours, that’s roughly fifty hours of instruction over an entire decade.

Now compare that to your own school.

If someone attended only five hours of class each year for ten years, would you consider them one of your active students? Most instructors probably wouldn’t. We’d likely describe them as someone who participated occasionally.

So why should the definition change simply because the instructor lived in another state or another country?

Distance doesn’t redefine the relationship. It only changes the opportunity for interaction.

My own experience was different.

I began training in Modern Arnis in 1985 and trained with Professor regularly for many years. Between monthly training, seminars, camps, private instruction, and extended weekends together, I estimate I accumulated well over 1,500 hours of direct training with him.

I don’t mention that to elevate my experience. I mention it to illustrate what an ongoing student-teacher relationship can look like. It was built over years of repeated instruction, correction, conversation, and mentorship—not just memorable seminars.

That doesn’t diminish anyone else’s experience.

A single seminar with a master can change the direction of your martial arts journey. You can learn lessons that stay with you for life.

But inspiration and mentorship are not always the same thing.

Learning from a master doesn’t always make you a student.

I’ve always made a distinction in my own school between participants, members, and students. Every person who walks through the door has value, but occasional participation isn’t the same as an ongoing student-teacher relationship.

The same applies to me.

I’ve attended seminars taught by exceptional martial artists throughout my career. I gladly give those instructors credit for what they taught me. But if I trained with someone once—or even several times—I wouldn’t honestly claim to be their student. I was a participant who had the privilege of learning from them.

The same principle applies outside of martial arts. I regularly attend business conferences and seminars where I learn from outstanding presenters. Their knowledge has helped me grow, but attending a presentation doesn’t make them my mentor. Just as in martial arts, a true student-teacher relationship requires an ongoing connection.

None of this diminishes Professor Presas’ legacy.

If anything, it highlights the extraordinary reach of his influence. Thousands learned from him. Thousands were inspired by him. His impact on Filipino Martial Arts is immeasurable.

At the same time, I believe we honor our teachers best by honestly describing the relationships we had with them.

Words matter.

Relationships matter.

Giving proper credit doesn’t diminish anyone’s experience—it puts it into its proper perspective.

So I’ll leave you with this question:

Where did your relationship with Professor fit? Were you a long-term student under his guidance, or were you someone who had the privilege of learning from him through seminars and camps? Both experiences have value—they’re simply different.

The original thought came from Bruce Chu, and I wanted to give him full credit for planting the seed for this discussion.

My goal isn’t to divide anyone or diminish anyone’s journey. It’s simply to encourage thoughtful reflection about what it truly means to be a student.

I’d genuinely like to hear your perspective.

Respectfully,
Datu Tim Hartman
The Tribal Chief